4.3 Article

Interacting multiple model particle filter for prognostics of lithium-ion batteries

Journal

MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 59-69

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2017.02.003

Keywords

Lithium-ion batteries; Remaining useful life; Particle filter; Interacting multiple model particle filter; Probability distribution function

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61175027, 61305013]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.NSRIF.2014071]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20132302120044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a new data-driven prognostic method based on the interacting multiple model particle filter (IMMPF) for determining the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries and the probability distribution function (PDF) of the associated uncertainty. The method applies the IMMPF to different state equations. Modeling the battery capacity degradation is very important for predicting the RUL of Li-ion batteries. In this study, improvements are made on various Li-ion battery capacity models (i.e., polynomial, exponential, and Verhulst models). Further, three different one-step state transition equations are developed, and the IMMPF method is applied to estimate the RUL of Li-ion batteries with the use of the three improved models. The PDF of the predicted RUL is obtained by combining the PDFs obtained with each individual model. We conduct four case studies to validate the proposed method. The results are as follows: (1) the three improved models require fewer parameters than the original models, (2) the proposed prognostic method shows stable and high prediction accuracy, and (3) the proposed method narrows the uncertainty PDF of the predicted RUL of Li-ion batteries. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available