4.7 Article

Accelerated solvent extraction of phenolic compounds exploiting a Box-Behnken design and quantification of five flavonoids by HPLC-DAD in Passiflora species

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 28-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.12.021

Keywords

Passiflora; Flavonoids; Accelerated solvent extraction; Box-Behnken design; Multi-response optimization

Funding

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional do Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [472605/2012-7]
  2. FAPESB (Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia) [PNE0008/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work describes the development of a method for the extraction of phenolic compounds, mainly fiavonoids, from species of Passiflora by employing accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and using a Box-Behnken design with desirability functions for optimization. The optimal extraction conditions consisted of an extraction temperature of 80 degrees C, 64% (w/w) ethanol and five number of extraction cycles. A high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) method for the identification and quantification of orientin, isoorientin, vitexin, isovitexin and rutin flavonoids in the leaves of seventeen Passiflora spp. using gradient elution with acetonitrile (solvent B) and 0.2% (w/w) formic acid in water (solvent A) as the eluent mixture was also developed and validated. These five fiavonoids were quantified with good linearity, LOQs, LODs, precision, and accuracy. Higher concentrations of isoorientin, orientin, vitexin, isovitexin and rutin were determinate in P. edulis f. flavicarpa (1.61 mg/g extract and 0.58 mg/g dry plant), P. morifolia (2.10 mg/g extract and 0.90 mg/g dry plant), P. setacea (2.48 mg/g extract and 0.97 mg/g dry plant), P. setacea (8.46 mg/g extract and 3.30 mg/g dry plant) and P. galbana (3.48 mg/g extract and 1.02 mg/g dry plant), respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All tights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available