4.3 Article

Interpreting physical and mental metaphors: Is Theory of Mind associated with pragmatics in middle childhood?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 393-407

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S030500091800048X

Keywords

pragmatics; experimental pragmatics; figurative language

Funding

  1. MIUR (Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca) PRIN (Progetti di Ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) 2015 project The Interpretative Brain: Understanding and Promoting Pragmatic Abilities across Lifespan and in Mental Illness [201577HA9M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the association between individual differences in metaphor understanding and Theory of Mind (ToM) in typically developing children. We distinguished between two types of metaphors and created a Physical and Mental Metaphors task, echoing a similar distinction for ToM. Nine-year-olds scored lower than older age-groups in ToM as well as in the interpretation of mental, but not physical, metaphors. Moreover, nine-year-olds (but not older children) who are better in ToM are also better in interpreting mental, but not physical, metaphors. This suggests that the link between metaphor and ToM is stronger when metaphorical interpretation involves mental aspects, and it is more evident in early rather than later childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available