4.7 Article

The loosening of American culture over 200 years is associated with a creativity-order trade-off

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 244-250

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0516-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. Thomas S. and Caroline H. Royster Fellowship
  3. Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For many years, scientists have studied culture by comparing societies, regions or social groups within a single point in time. However, culture is always changing, and this change affects the evolution of cognitive processes and behavioural practices across and within societies. Studies have now documented historical changes in sexism(1), individualism(2,3), language use(4) and music preferences(5) within the United States and around the world(6). Here we build on these efforts by examining changes in cultural tightness-looseness (the strength of cultural norms and tolerance for deviance) over time, using the United States as a case study. We first develop a new linguistic measure to measure historical changes in tightness-looseness. Analyses show that America grew progressively less tight (i.e., looser) from 1800 to 2000. We next examine how changes in tightness-looseness relate to four indicators of societal order: debt (adjusted for inflation), adolescent pregnancies and crime, and high school attendance, as well as four indicators of creative output: registered patents, trademarks, feature films produced, and baby-naming conformity. We find that cultural tightness correlates negatively with each measure of creativity, and correlates positively with three out of four measures of societal order (fewer adolescent pregnancies, less debt and higher levels of school attendance). These findings imply that the historical loosening of American culture was associated with a trade-off between higher creativity but lower order.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available