4.7 Article

Multi-parametric imaging of cell heterogeneity in apoptosis analysis

Journal

METHODS
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 105-123

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.07.003

Keywords

Apoptosis; Fluorescent microscopy; Imaging flow cytometry; Flow cytometry; Programmed cell death; Multicolor imaging

Funding

  1. RFBR (Russian Federation) [13-04-40189-H]
  2. project TFP [0212/PCF-14-OT(3)]
  3. Republic of Kazakhstan [0472/GF4]
  4. Harvard Pilot Grant
  5. MES of Republic of Kazakhstan [100/14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apoptosis is a multistep process of programmed cell death where different morphological and molecular events occur simultaneously and/or consequently. Recent progress in programmed cell death analysis uncovered large heterogeneity in response of individual cells to the apoptotic stimuli. Analysis of the complex and dynamic process of apoptosis requires a capacity to quantitate multiparametric data obtained from multicolor labeling and/or fluorescent reporters of live cells in conjunction with morphological analysis. Modern methods of multiparametric apoptosis study include but are not limited to fluorescent microscopy, flow cytometry and imaging flow cytometry. In the current review we discuss the image-based evaluation of apoptosis on the single-cell and population level by imaging flow cytometry in parallel with other techniques. The advantage of imaging flow cytometry is its ability to interrogate multiparametric morphometric and fluorescence quantitative data in statistically robust manner. Here we describe the current status and future perspectives of this emerging field, as well as some challenges and limitations. We also highlight a number of assays and multicolor labeling probes, utilizing both microscopy and different variants of imaging cytometry, including commonly based assays and novel developments in the field. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available