4.6 Article

Design of new face-centered cubic high entropy alloys by thermodynamic calculation

Journal

METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 839-847

Publisher

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-017-6701-1

Keywords

phase diagram; high entropy alloys (HEAs); CALPHAD; X-ray diffraction; electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD)

Funding

  1. Future Material Discovery Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) of Korea [2016M3D1A1023384]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M3D1A1023384] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new face-centered cubic (fcc) high entropy alloy system with non-equiatomic compositions has been designed by utilizing a CALculation of PHAse Diagram (CALPHAD) - type thermodynamic calculation technique. The new alloy system is based on the representative fcc high entropy alloy, the Cantor alloy which is an equiatomic Co- Cr-Fe-Mn-Ni five-component alloy, but fully or partly replace the cobalt by vanadium and is of non-equiatomic compositions. Alloy compositions expected to have an fcc single-phase structure between 700 A degrees C and melting temperatures are proposed. All the proposed alloys are experimentally confirmed to have the fcc single-phase during materials processes (> 800 A degrees C), through an X-ray diffraction analysis. It is shown that there are more chances to find fcc single-phase high entropy alloys if paying attention to non-equiatomic composition regions and that the CALPHAD thermodynamic calculation can be an efficient tool for it. An alloy design technique based on thermodynamic calculation is demonstrated and the applicability and limitation of the approach as a design tool for high entropy alloys is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available