4.6 Article

Effects of tensile twinning on the stretch formability of Mg

Journal

METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 444-449

Publisher

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-017-6399-0

Keywords

rolling; twinning; erichsen test; alloying elements; grain size

Funding

  1. World Premier Materials (WPM) Program
  2. Korea Ministry of Knowledge Economy through the Research Institute of Advanced Materials
  3. International Research & Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT Future Planning [2015R1A2A1A01006795]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A1A01006795] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the influences of twinning during the Erichsen test. {10-12} tensile twinning plays the critical role in Mg alloys. Alloy elements and grain size are important factors that determine the formation of {10-12} tensile twins at room temperature. Mg-6.0Zn(Z6) and Mg-6.0Zn-0.3Ca(ZX60) alloys were fabricated and their grain size was varied under different annealing conditions. Tensile twinning is promoted by the addition of Ca, as assessed from measurements of the microstructure and the viscoplastic self-consistent calculations. The coarse-grain Ca-containing alloy showed the largest amount of tensile twinning. However, the stretch formability increased with grain size up to a certain point and then decreased. It can be inferred that microstructures with large grains activated the tensile twin, which became origins of cracks. The results of the small Erichsen test showed that tensile twinning contributes to high stretch formability releasing the stress concentration in the grain boundaries but the interaction between twin and slip causes cracks as the grain size increases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available