4.1 Article

Temperature-dependent compression behavior of an Al0.5CoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloy

Journal

MATERIALIA
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100243

Keywords

High-entropy alloy; High temperature deformation; Precipitation strengthening; Intermetallic precipitates; Deformation induced precipitation

Funding

  1. WPI Research Center Initiative for Atoms, Molecules and Materials
  2. MEXT
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1408722, DMR-1611180, 180964]
  4. Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University
  5. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) [DE-FE-0011194]
  6. U.S. Army Office Project [W911NF-13-1-0438]
  7. Center for Materials Processing (CMP), at The University of Tennessee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanical response of an Al0.5CoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloy (HEA) was investigated through uniaxial compression tests, the 0.2% offset yield strength decreases with increasing temperature up to 773 K. However, at temperatures above 773 K, two yield strength hardening regions peaked at 873 K and 1073 K were observed. Microstructure analyses reveal an enhanced L1(2) ordering with the increase of compression temperatures and the subsequent precipitation of B2 phase at 973 K. Meanwhile, transmission electron microscopy observations of the post-deformation microstructures show that plastic deformation is primarily carried by dislocation at room temperature, and changes to twinning at temperatures higher than 873 K. At deformation temperatures higher than 1073 K, a mixed microstructure of dislocations and deformation twins is observed. These results suggest that the emerging of the yield strength peaks at high temperatures is related to the precipitation of the L1(2) and B2 intermetallic phases and high-temperature deformation influences the phase separation and phase selection of the HEA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available