4.7 Article

A Key for Achieving Higher Open-Circuit Voltage in Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells: Lowering Interfacial Electrode Polarization

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 587-597

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01617

Keywords

protonic ceramic fuel cell (PCFC); open-circuit voltage (OCV); electrode polarization; electrode/electrolyte interface; barium zirconate-cerate

Funding

  1. Advanced Research Program for Energy and Environmental Technologies of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI) [JP15K18239]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) have a great potential to realize higher energy-conversion efficiency compared with all other conventional devices, actual PCFCs have shown current leakage loss due to their intrinsic transport property with electron-hole conduction of proton-conducting electrolytes, resulting in a decrease in efficiency. The present study shows a new finding that open-circuit voltage (OCV), which is an indicator of current leakage loss, depends on the ratio of the electrode polarization resistance to the electrolyte ohmic resistance within a PCFC and experimentally demonstrates improvement in OCV by developing high-performance cathode and anode. Results show that our anode supported PCFC with BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Th0.1O3-delta electrolyte and high-performance electrodes achieves extremely high OCV, e.g., 1.112 V at 600 degrees C (approximate to 98% of the theoretical OCV) and 1.132 V at 550 degrees C (approximate to 99% of the theoretical OCV). Compared with recently reported OCVs for PCFCs, these measured OCVs are remarkably high. These results indicate that high-performance electrodes lead to suppression of current leakage loss in PCFCs and thus enable PCFCs to operate with higher energy conversion efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available