4.5 Article

Fire Risk Assessment of Combustible Exterior Cladding Using a Collective Numerical Database

Journal

FIRE-SWITZERLAND
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fire2010011

Keywords

fire risk assessment; combustible building materials; high-rise buildings; large eddy simulation; pyrolysis

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre) [IC170100032]
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  3. Tactical Research Fund, Bushfire and Natural Hazard Cooperative Research Centre in Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent high-profile building fires involving highly-combustible external cladding panels in Australia as well as Dubai, China, and the United Kingdom have created a heightened awareness by the public, government, and commercial entities to act on the risks associated with non-compliant building structures. In this paper, a database of fire events involving combustible aluminium composite panels was developed based on (i) review of relevant major fire events in Australia and other countries, and (ii) numerical simulation of the ignitability, fire spread, and toxic emissions associated with composite panels. Through the application of large-eddy-simulation (LES)-based computational fire field models, the associated risks for a standardized two-storey building with external cladding was considered in this study. A total of sixteen simulation cases with different initial sizes of the fire and different air cavity widths in the exterior cladding assembly were examined to investigate the tolerable situations and their influences. It was discovered that for most cases, with an initial fire size greater than 400 kW/m(-2), the fire will spread from the first to second floor before the allowed egress time period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available