4.2 Article

A prospective multicenter cohort study of cutaneous melanoma: clinical staging and potential associations with HIF-1α and VEGF expressions

Journal

MELANOMA RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 558-564

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000393

Keywords

hypoxia-inducible factor; malignancy; melanoma; mitotic index; vascular endothelial growth factor

Funding

  1. Fundacion Cientifica de la Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer
  2. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena [FMM-2013/0075]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Health [FIS 2014/1737, FIS 2016/01772]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Melanoma is a highly prevalent cancer that is associated with substantial mortality. Although clinical staging procedures can serve as relatively robust prognostic indicators, we aimed to determine whether assessments of the abundance of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in postexcisional melanoma tumor tissues may enable more accurate determination of tumor aggressiveness. We carried out a multicenter prospective study, in which we systematically evaluated 376 consecutive patients diagnosed with melanoma, and performed histochemical assessments for both HIF-1 alpha and VEGF immunoreactivity in the tumor biopsies. Multivariate analyses showed that higher HIF-1 alpha expression, but not high VEGF, were associated significantly and independently with increased tumor aggressiveness as derived from several well-established aggressiveness criteria. A limitation of this study was that this was a descriptive prospective study lacking a post-hoc verification arm. Thus, the presence of increased numbers of positively labeled HIF-1 alpha cells in melanoma tumors may potentially serve as an indicator of tumor phenotype and prognosis, and accordingly guide therapy. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available