4.7 Article

Star Formation Rates of Massive Molecular Clouds in the Central Molecular Zone

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 872, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab017d

Keywords

Galaxy: center; ISM: clouds; stars: formation

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K13589]
  2. NSFC [11629302]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [KR4801/1-1]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme via the ERC Starting Grant MUSTANG [714907]
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. STFC [ST/J001465/1, ST/L00061X/1, ST/R000484/1, ST/F007159/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate star formation at very early evolutionary phases in five massive clouds in the inner 500 pc of the Galaxy, the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ). Using interferometer observations of H2O masers and ultra-compact H II regions, we find evidence of ongoing star formation embedded in cores of 0.2. pc scales and greater than or similar to 10(5) cm(-3) densities. Among the five clouds, SgrC possesses a high (9%) fraction of gas mass in gravitationally bound and/or protostellar cores, and follows the dense (greater than or similar to 10(4) cm(-3)) gas star formation relation that is extrapolated from nearby clouds. The other four clouds have less than 1% of their cloud masses in gravitationally bound and/or protostellar cores, and star formation rates 10 times lower than predicted by the dense gas star formation relation. At the spatial scale of these cores, the star formation efficiency is comparable to that in Galactic disk sources. We suggest that the overall inactive star formation in these CMZ clouds could be because there is much less gas confined in gravitationally bound cores, which may be a result of the strong turbulence in this region and/or the very early evolutionary stage of the clouds when collapse has only recently started.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available