4.0 Review

Towards a framework for innovation orientation within business and management studies A systematic review and paths for future research

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 123-144

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-02-2018-0051

Keywords

Performance measures; Antecedents; Innovation orientation; Organizational capabilities

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The innovation orientation theory has emerged within the literature in the last 40 years particular within the development of other strategic orientations, but the bulk of seminal literature in the area has been developed in the past 11 years. The purpose of this paper is to revisit the concept innovation orientation in the light of recent research. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a systematic review of this literature, covering 74 scholarly articles published between 1982 and 2017. Findings Innovation orientation is a sub-construct positioned within the wider field of innovation and relates to an innovation-based strategic orientation, where orientation is used to describe the overall dominant approach that represents an organisation's competitive posture and strategic focus. It is a multifaceted construct that includes a range of core common variables innovation culture, competition-based understanding, organisational flexibility and specific capital and knowledge capabilities and is particular relevant for that managers and executives to understand how to manage innovation at the firm level. Literature also reports links between innovation orientation and organisational performance. Originality/value On the basis of these analyses, a comprehensive innovation orientation framework is developed including key antecedents and key outcomes in terms of performance enhancement and capabilities development. Suggestions for future research are also presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available