Journal
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 49, Issue 8, Pages 1520-1529Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001282
Keywords
HIP JOINT; PELVIS; KINEMATICS; KINETICS; SQUAT
Categories
Funding
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [ID631717]
- NHMRC [APP1058440, APP1002190]
- Australian Research Council [FT130100175]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: Identification of the biomechanical alterations in individuals with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is critical to understand the pathology and inform treatments. Yet hip function in this condition is poorly defined. Squatting requires large hip flexion range and involves motion toward the position of hip impingement; thus, it is likely to expose modified biomechanics in these individuals. This study aimed to determine whether hip and pelvis biomechanics differ between individuals with and without symptomatic FAI during an unconstrained deep squat and a constrained squat designed to limit compensation by the pelvis and trunk. Methods: Fifteen participants with symptomatic cam-type or combined (cam plus pincer) FAI who were scheduled for arthroscopic surgery and 14 age-and sex-matched controls without FAI underwent three-dimensional motion analysis during the two squatting tasks. Trunk, pelvis, and hip kinematics and hip kinetics were compared between groups. Results: There were no between-group differences in normalized squat depth for either task. Descent speed was slower for the FAI group during the unconstrained squat (P < 0.05). During the constrained squat, individuals with FAI demonstrated greater pelvic rise (P = 0.01) and hip adduction (P = 0.04) on the symptomatic side than controls. The hip external rotation moment was less in FAI patients during descent (P = 0.04), as was transverse plane hip angle variability (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Individuals with symptomatic FAI can squat to a depth comparable with controls, regardless of task design. When the task is constrained, FAI patients demonstrate greater ipsilateral pelvic rise and maintain a more adducted hip position, which may coincide with a compensatory strategy to avoid end range flexion as the hip approaches impingement. These biomechanical alterations may put additional stress on adjacent regions and have relevance for rehabilitation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available