4.5 Review

Development of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Guide the Management of Blood Pressure, Fluid Volume, and Dialysis Dose in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: Proof of Concept and First Clinical Assessment

Journal

KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 28-33

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000493479

Keywords

Hemodialysis; Artificial intelligence; Intradialytic hypotension; Dialysis adequacy; Fluid overload; Hemodynamics; Heart rate; Personalized medicine; Medical decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Fluid volume and blood pressure (BP) management are crucial endpoints for end-stage kidney disease patients. BP control in clinical practice mainly relies on reducing extracellular fluid volume overload by diminishing targeted postdialysis weight. This approach exposes dialysis patients to intradialytic hypotensive episodes. Summary: Both chronic hypertension and intradialytic hypotension lead to adverse long-term outcomes. Achieving the optimal trade-off between adequate fluid removal and the risk of intradialytic adverse events is a complex task in clinical practice given the multiple patient-related and dialysis-related factors affecting the hemodynamic response to treatment. State-of-the-art artificial intelligence has been adopted in other complex decision-making tasks for dialysis patients and may help personalize the multiple dialysis-related pre-scriptions affecting patients' intradialytic hemodynamics. As a proof of concept, we developed a multiple-endpoint model predicting session-specific Kt/V, fluid volume removal, heart rate, and BP based on patient characteristics, historic hemodynamic responses, and dialysis-related prescriptions. Key Messages: The accuracy and precision of this preliminary model is extremely encouraging. Such analytic tools may be used to anticipate patients' reactions through simulation so that the best strategy can be chosen based on clinical judgment or formal utility functions. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available