3.8 Review

A Systematic Review of the Outcome of Hair Transplantation in Primary Scarring Alopecia

Journal

SKIN APPENDAGE DISORDERS
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 65-71

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000492539

Keywords

Scarring alopecia; Cicatricial alopecia; Hair loss; Hair transplant

Categories

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [TL1 TR001415, UL1 TR001414] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Importance: Hair loss, or alopecia, is one of the most commonly presented problems in dermatology. Scarring alopecias are considered particularly damaging due to limited success in slowing permanent disease progression, and current treatment methods, such as intralesional and topical steroids and topical minoxidil, are largely ineffective. Objective: Hair transplantation is a debated treatment option for advanced cases of primary scarring alopecia. This study reviews the efficacy of hair transplantation as a treatment option for primary scarring alopecia. Evidence Review: A primary literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify articles in scarring alopecia and hair transplants published from 1960 to the present time. Findings: Fifteen reports with 34 patients were included in this review. Twenty six patients experienced moderate to positive results, while 8 patients experienced negative results or recurrence of disease. Positive hair transplantation results have been reported in patients with central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, en coup de sabre, discoid lupus erythematous, pseudopelade de brocq, and folliculitis decalvans. Positive and negative results were observed in patients with lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia. Conclusion and Relevance: Findings show that hair transplant surgery can be considered as a treatment option for certain primary scarring alopecias. However, data must be interpreted with caution due to concern for positive-result publication bias. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available