3.8 Review

Diagnosing bluetongue virus in domestic ruminants: current perspectives

Journal

VETERINARY MEDICINE-RESEARCH AND REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 17-27

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/VMRR.S163804

Keywords

bluetongue virus; diagnostic tests; virus isolation; serological tools

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [AGL2015-64290R]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [S2013/ABI-2906-PLATESA]
  3. European Union (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, FEDER funds)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides an overview of current and potential new diagnostic techniques against bluetongue virus (BTV), an Orbivirus transmitted by arthropods that affects ruminants. Bluetongue is a disease currently notifiable to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), causing great economic losses due to decreased trade associated with bluetongue outbreaks and high mortality and morbidity. BTV cross-reacts with many antigenically related viruses including viruses that causes African Horse sickness and epizootic haemorrhagic disease of deer. Therefore, reliable diagnostic approaches to detect BTV among these other antigenically related viruses are used or being developed. The antigenic determinant for differentiation of virus species/serogroups among orbiviruses is the VP7 protein, meanwhile VP2 is serotype specific. Serologically, assays are established in many laboratories, based mainly on competitive ELISA or serum neutralization assay (virus neutralization assay [VNT]) although new techniques are being developed. Virus isolation from blood or semen is, additionally, another means of BTV diagnosis. Nevertheless, most of these techniques for viral isolation are time-consuming and expensive. Currently, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) panels or real-time RT-PCR are widely used methods although next-generation sequencing remains of interest for future virus diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available