Journal
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 471-481Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000550
Keywords
economic inequality; moral judgment; social reasoning; resource allocation; fairness
Categories
Funding
- American Psychological Association
- American Psychological Foundation
- University of Maryland College of Education
- Moral Development Lab at the University of Maryland
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined how children's perceptions of economic inequalities impacted their moral judgments about access to opportunities. The sample included ethnically diverse 8- to 14-year-olds (N = 267; M = 11.61 years, SD = 1.88) of middle- to upper-middle-income backgrounds. The larger the economic inequality in access to opportunities children perceived, the more negatively they evaluated granting access to a specific opportunity (an educational summer camp) to high-wealth peers alone, and the more they reasoned about the importance of fair access to learning. Further, children were more supportive of admitting low-wealth peers when they knew they had been excluded from the opportunity in the past, and children who chose to admit low-wealth peers reasoned about the implications of broader economic inequalities. Finally, most children preferred to take an active role in determining who should receive access to this special opportunity rather than leaving the decision to chance. These findings provide evidence for how perceptions of both broad and context specific intergroup relations contribute to moral judgments in childhood.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available