4.6 Article

Temperature monitoring during microwave ablation in ex vivo porcine livers

Journal

EJSO
Volume 41, Issue 12, Pages 1699-1705

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.08.171

Keywords

Microwave ablation; Tissue; Thermometry; Hyperthermal treatment; Liver ablation; Fiber optic sensors

Funding

  1. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  2. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA033572]
  3. Campus Bio-Medico Alumni Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the temperature map and its reproducibility while applying two different MWA systems (915 MHz vs 2.45 GHz) in ex vivo porcine livers. Materials and methods: Fifteen fresh pig livers were treated using the two antennae at three different settings: treatment time of 10 min and power of 45 W for both systems; 4 min and 100 W for the 2.45 GHz system. Trends of temperature were recorded during all procedures by means of fiber optic-based probes located at five fixed distances from the antenna, ranging between 10 mm and 30 mm. Each trial was repeated twice to assess the reproducibility of temperature distribution. Results: Temperature as function of distance from the antenna can be modeled by a decreasing exponential trend. At the same settings, temperature obtained with the 2.45 GHz system was higher than that obtained with the 915 MHz thus resulting into a wider area of ablation (diameter 17 mm vs 15 mm). Both systems showed good reproducibility in terms of temperature distribution (root mean squared difference for both systems ranged between 2.8 degrees C and 3.4 degrees C). Conclusions: When both MWA systems are applied, a decreasing exponential model can predict the temperature map. The 2.45 GHz antenna causes higher temperatures as compared to the 915 MHz thus, resulting into larger areas of ablation. Both systems showed good reproducibility although better results were achieved with the 2.45 GHz antenna. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available