4.5 Article

Sources of High Sulfate Aerosol Concentration Observed at Cape Hedo in Spring 2012

Journal

AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 587-600

Publisher

TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.09.0350

Keywords

Air quality model; Source apportionment; Tagged tracer method; East Asia; Cape Hedo Atmosphere and Aerosol Monitoring Station (CHAAMS)

Funding

  1. Global Environment Research Fund of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan [5-1751, 2-1703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensive observation campaigns approximately 1 week long were conducted periodically from March 2010 to November 2015 at Cape Hedo, Okinawa, Japan. The maximum daily mean sulfate aerosol (SO42-) concentrations surpassed 15 mu g m(-3) in spring 2012. In this study, source apportionment for these high concentrations was conducted using an air quality model with the tagged tracer method, and the main source was identified as volcanoes in March and as anthropogenic emissions from China in April. In March, the prevailing northerly wind transported a volcanic SO2 plume with a low conversion ratio to Cape Hedo. The impacts of 15 volcanoes in Japan were estimated, and a substantial impact from Sakurajima, which accounted for more SO2 than anthropogenic emissions from Japan, was found. Because the model had difficulty capturing the highest concentration, three sensitivity simulations were performed to consider the uncertainty of the volcanic SO2 emission amounts and injection heights, revealing the importance of the injection height in addition to the SO2 emission amount. Throughout April, contributions from anthropogenic emissions from China were found; hence, this source was further divided into 31 provincial scales. Shandong and Jiangsu Provinces, which are the first and seventh largest emission sources in China, respectively, were identified as significant sources at Cape Hedo. These sources showed day-to-day variation in their contributions, and the highest contribution from Shandong Province occurred on April 23, whereas that from Jiangsu Province occurred on April 22.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available