4.6 Article

Potential dependent capacitance of [EMIM][TFSI], [N1114][TFSI] and [PYR13][TFSI] ionic liquids on glassy carbon

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 3712-3720

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp04631j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Case Western Reserve University College of Engineering
  2. Case Western Reserve University Vice President of Research Catalyst Publication Subvention Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differential capacitances of ionic liquids (ILs) butyl-trimethylammonium bis(trifluoromethyl sulfonyl) imide, [N-1114][TFSI], methyl-propylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide, [PYR13][TFSI], and ethyl-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide, [EMIM][TFSI], were measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) over the entire electrochemical window determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV). Distinct fast charging and discharging process frequencies were obtained from the complex capacitance plane extracted from EIS. The onset frequencies of the charging processes were found to be independent of the bulk viscosity of the liquid. [N-1114][TFSI] showed the largest relative increase in capacitance with respect to the point of zero charge with applied potential as a result of the 'crowding' effect. This is attributed to a larger degree of rotational freedom associated with the independent alkyl chains and the accessibility of larger potentials with the more stable cation. The largest overall capacitance among the ILs studied was observed for [PYR13][TFSI] at its anodic maximum which occurs due to ` overscreening'. The interpretation of the measured differential capacitance according to the extended mean field theory of Goodwin-Kornyshev [Z. A. Goodwin, et al., Electrochim. Acta., 2017, 225, 190-197] reveals that the ILs with increased ion associations demonstrate the largest relative increase in capacitance with potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available