4.6 Article

Structural exploration of hydrophobic core in polycationic micelles for improving siRNA delivery efficiency and cell viability

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 965-973

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8tb02706d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671021, 81502586, 81773622]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving siRNA delivery efficiency often encounters a dilemma with poor or decreased biocompatibility for polycationic micelles. To address this dilemma, this work focused on a structural exploration of the hydrophobic core in amphiphilic polycationic micelles by preparing two amphiphilic polycations with block or random hydrophobic segments, poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(aminoethyl methacrylate)-block-poly(2-diamylamine ethyl methacrylate)-block-poly(2-diethylamine ethyl methacrylate) (mPEG-PAMA-PD5A-PDEA, PADE) and poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(aminoethyl methacrylate)-block-poly(2-diamylamine ethyl methacrylate-co-2-diethylamine ethyl methacrylate) (mPEG-PAMA-P(D5A/DEA), PA(D/E)). The properties of the two copolymers and their self-assembly micelles were characterized, including structure, morphology, size and zeta potential. Cytotoxicity, siRNA silencing efficiency and cellular uptake of PADE/siRNA and PA(D/E)/siRNA complexes were evaluated in HepG2 and MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro. The endosome escape and intracellular distribution of PADE/siRNA and PA(D/E)/siRNA in HepG2 cells were also observed by CLSM. Significantly, the results indicated that PA(D/E)/siRNA showed not only better gene silencing efficiency but also lower cytotoxicity, which may be attributed to the homogeneous morphology of the hydrophobic core of PA(D/E) micelles. Therefore, this work provides a new pathway to overcome the dilemma between siRNA delivery efficiency and biocompatibility for the development of efficient polycation carriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available