4.7 Article

Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 91-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Better Bike Share Partnership, United States
  2. JPB Foundation
  3. City of Philadelphia
  4. People for Bikes
  5. Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia Area
  6. National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO)
  7. Seattle Department of Transportation
  8. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) at the University of Washington
  9. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [5T32HD057822-07]
  10. National Library of Medicine, United States [1K99LM012868]
  11. Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, United States

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bike sharing systems have potential to substantially boost active transportation levels (and consequent physical and mental health) in urban populations. We explored equity of spatial access in a novel `dockless' bike share system that does not that constrain bike pickup and drop-off locations to docking stations. Methods: Starting in July 2017, Seattle, Washington piloted a dockless bike share system that made 10,000 bikes available. We merged data on resident socio-demographic and economic characteristics from the American Community Survey about 93 defined neighborhoods with data about bike locations, bike idle time, and which neighborhoods operators rebalanced bikes to. We used mapping and descriptive statistics to compare access between neighborhoods along sociodemographic and economic lines. Results: With many bikes available, no neighborhood was consistently excluded from access. However, the average availability ranged from 3 bikes per day to 341 per day. Neighborhoods with more bikes had more college-educated residents (median 75% college-educated vs. 65%) and local community resources (median opportunity index score of 24 vs. 19), and higher incomes (median 83,202 vs. 71,296). Rebalancing destinations were strongly correlated with neighborhood demand (r = 0.61). Conclusions: The overall scale of the dockless system ensured there was baseline access throughout Seattle. We observed modest inequities in access along sociodemographic lines, similar to prior findings in studies of docked bike share systems. Dockless bike share systems hold promise for offering equitable spatial access to bike sharing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available