4.5 Review

Coenzyme Q10 supplementation therapy for 2 children with proteinuria renal disease and ADCK4 mutation Case reports and literature review

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 96, Issue 47, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008880

Keywords

ADCK4 mutation; coenzyme Q10; mitochondrial nephropathy; proteinuria

Funding

  1. National Natural Foundation of China [81470939, 81270792]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120101110018]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LH14H050002, LY15H050001]
  4. Medicine & Health Technology Innovation Project of Zhejiang Province [2014KYA123]
  5. Science & Technology Bureau of Zhejiang Province [2015C33127]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Mitochondrial nephropathy has a poor prognosis and often progresses to the end-stage renal disease. Renal pathology often is focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and does not respond to steroid therapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Some patients are benefited from the therapy of coenzyme Q10, which affect the synthesis pathway of coenzyme Q10. Patient concerns: Herein, we report 2 cases of children with proteinuria renal disease with ADCK4 mutation. Diagnoses: Proteinuria renal disease with ADCK4 mutation. Interventions: Compound heterozygous mutation in ADCK4 gene were detected with next-generation sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Both of the patients were given coenzyme Q10 supplementation therapy. Outcomes: The first patient showed a decreased proteinuria after coenzyme Q10 supplementation therapy, while the other was not improved. Lessons: Based on the cases we reported and from the literature, recognition of ADCK4 mutation through early and accurate genetic screening could be helpful in avoiding unnecessary toxicities and in preventing complications arising in mitochondrial nephropathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available