Journal
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 73-90Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12251
Keywords
CINAHL; database searching; precision; randomised controlled trials (RCT); recall; search strategies
Categories
Funding
- Cochrane
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background Evidence synthesis reviews in health care rely on the efficient identification of research evidence, particularly evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). There are no recently validated filters to identify RCTs in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus). Objectives To develop, test and validate a search filter to identify reports of RCTs from CINAHL Plus. Methods Nine sets of relevant and irrelevant records were identified to develop and test search filters iteratively. Two sets were used to validate the sensitivity and precision of the filters. The performance of two previously published filters and the filter built into EBSCOhost was evaluated. Results We present a validated filter which offers sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95) and precision of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.31-0.41). This is comparable to the sensitivity of published filters, but has much better precision. Conclusions A sensitive and precise filter, developed using records selected based on title and abstract information, is available for identifying reports of RCTs in the CINAHL Plus database via EBSCOhost. Using this filter is likely to reduce the number of results needing to be screened to a quarter of those retrieved by other published filters.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available