4.5 Article

Clinical characteristics of a KIF21A mutation in a Chinese family with congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 1

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 96, Issue 38, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008068

Keywords

clinical characteristic; congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles; direct sequence; KIF21A; mutation

Funding

  1. Bureau of Science and Technology of WenZhou [Y20150075]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81201181, 81473295, 81670882]
  3. Science Technology project of Zhejiang Province [2017C37176]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study is to characterize the clinical ocular phenotype with congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 1 (CFEOM1) and to confirm whether the kinesin family member 21A (KIF21A) mutation was the pathogenic gene in this Chinese family. Three affected individuals and 2 asymptomatic kinsfolk from a Chinese family underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, orbital computerized tomography (CT), and postoperative histological examinations were performed in the proband. All the recruited members were screened for 3 exons (8, 20, and 21) of KIF21A mutations using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and direct sequencing of corresponding PCR products. All patients shared the clinical characteristics including bilateral ophthalmoplegia, blepharoptosis, hypertropic, and exotropic position with inability to raise either eye above the midline and a chin-up head position. Direct DNA sequence analysis from the affected members revealed a missense mutation in KIF21A (c. 2860C>T, p.R954W). The unaffected members did not harbor the p. R954W mutation. The candidate mutation was not present in multiple web-accessible and in-house exome databases. The p. Arg954Trp mutation of KIF21A was the causative mutation in this Chinese pedigree with CFEOM1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available