4.5 Article

3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01209

Keywords

Condensed matter physics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tetramorphth crystals of 4,4-dimethylbenzophenone (D) were obtained using slow-evaporation crystallization method and the structure is elucidated using single crystal X-ray diffraction technique. D crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system (space group Pbca) with cell parameters a = 14.6986 (11) angstrom, b = 6.1323 (4) angstrom, c = 26.2730 (18) angstrom, V = 2368.2 (3) angstrom(3) and Z = 8. In the crystal structure, intermolecular interaction of the type C-H center dot center dot center dot pi stabilizes the crystal packing. This polymorph is the fourth candidate of its kind and second candidate in the orthorhombic crystal system. The structural comparisons and crystal packing of tetramorphs (A, B, C and D) are analyzed using molecular structures, Hirshfeld surfaces, enrichment ratios (E) and energy frameworks. The conformational differences are observed in all the tetramorphs and the intercontacts H center dot center dot center dot H and C center dot center dot center dot H contributes around 85 % to the Hirshfeld surfaces. The E ratio provides evidence of H center dot center dot center dot H, C center dot center dot center dot H and O center dot center dot center dot H intercontacts having high propensity to form contacts in the crystal packing. The average energy (dimer formation) for each polymorph is calculated from energy framework analysis. The systematic comparison of crystal packing in tetramorphs through 3D-topology is visualized. In the energy-frameworks of the crystal packing, dispersion energy dominates over the electrostatic energy. Overall, the molecular packings of the four polymorphic structures are different.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available