4.5 Article

Serum PLR and LMR in Behcet's disease Can they show the disease activity?

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 96, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006981

Keywords

Behcet's disease; lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; platelet to lymphocyte ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to determine platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocytes to monocytes ratio (LMR) levels in Behcet's disease (BD) and to investigate their relationships with disease activity. Hematological and inflammatory parameters including high-sensitivity C-reactive proteins (hs-CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), PLR, and LMR were examined in BD and healthy controls. Data from 140 patients with BD (108 with active and 32 with inactive disease) and 107 controls were enrolled. PLR (153.21 +/- 65.44, 106.20 +/- 28.91, P<.001, respectively) was remarkably higher, whereas LMR (5.37 +/- 5.47, 8.95 +/- 5.84, P<.001, respectively) was significantly lower in BD than in controls. Active BD patients had significantly higher PLR (159.20 vs 131.14, P = .037), ESR (38.30 vs 24.55, P =. 017), and hs-CRP (30.20 vs 17.21, P =. 027) than those with inactive BD. However, no significant difference in LMR was found between the groups. Moreover, PLR was positively correlated with BDCAF (r=0.193, P<.05), hs-CRP (r=0.402, P<.01), and ESR (r=0.284, P<.01), whereas LMR was negatively correlated with BDCAF (r=-0.175, P<.05), hs-CPR (r=-0.263, P<.01), and ESR (r=-0.175, P<. 05). Additionally, both PLR and LMR were shown to be independent factors for BD by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, a PLR level of 124.63 was determined as the best cut-off value by ROC analysis (sensitivity 64.3%, specificity 78.0%, and the area under the ROC curve 0. 753). PLR was elevated in active BD as compared to inactive BD. PLR may be a reliable, cost-effective, and novel potential parameter to help evaluate disease activity in BD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available