4.7 Article

Cost consequence-based reliability analysis of bursting and buckling failure modes in subsea pipelines

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 64-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.joes.2019.01.001

Keywords

Subsea pipeline; Bursting; Buckling; Construction quality; Reliability; Monte Carlo Simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Risk assessment is a fundamental activity to evaluate the integrity of pipeline systems during their life cycle, which allows pipeline operators to focus attention on integrity management activities in order to prevent and mitigate failure and maintain the design safety level. Risks for materials and contractor's quality are a major source of concern about the integrity of pipelines and have a remarkable influence on the optimized balance between capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operation expenses (OPEX) in risk-based integrity management of pipeline. While other sources of risks to pipelines have been investigated thoroughly, the impacts of construction and material quality have not been well studied yet. This paper addresses the influence of construction accuracy/quality and corresponding uncertainties on the failure of submarine pipelines in the presence of corrosion. Corrosion-bursting and corrosion-buckling failure modes (which are addressed as ultimate limit states of subsea pipeline in DNV-OS-F101) are investigated in a reliability analysis to predict critical failure year of the pipe. Sensitivity analysis is also implemented to estimate the importance of parameters on failure probability using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). The results show a high sensitivity of failure probability to construction accuracy, which defines contractor quality. (C) 2019 Shanghai Jiaotong University. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available