4.6 Article

Exploring Host-Guest Interactions in the α-Zn3(HCOO)6 Metal-Organic Framework

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 4000-4011

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03623

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. National Research Council Canada
  3. Bruker BioSpin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising gas adsorbents. Knowledge of the behavior of gas molecules adsorbed inside MOFs is crucial for advancing MOFs as gas capture materials. However, their behavior is not always well understood. In this work, carbon dioxide (CO2) adsorption in the microporous alpha-Zn-3(HCOO)(6) MOF was investigated. The behavior of the CO2 molecules inside the MOF was comprehensively studied by a combination of single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) and multinuclear solid-state magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The locations of CO2 molecules adsorbed inside the channels of the framework were accurately determined using SCXRD, and the framework hydrogens from the formate linkers were found to act as adsorption sites. Zn-67 solid-state NMR (SSNMR) results suggest that CO2 adsorption does not significantly affect the metal center environment. Variable-temperature C-13 SSNMR experiments were performed to quantitatively examine guest dynamics. The results indicate that CO2 molecules adsorbed inside the MOF channel undergo two types of anisotropic motions: a localized rotation (or wobbling) upon the adsorption site and a twofold hopping between adjacent sites located along the MOF channel. Interestingly, C-13 SSNMR spectroscopy targeting adsorbed CO2 reveals negative thermal expansion (NTE) of the framework as the temperature rose past ca. 293 K. A comparative study shows that carbon monoxide (CO) adsorption does not induce framework shrinkage at high temperatures, suggesting that the NTE effect is guest-specific.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available