4.7 Article

Microplastic deposition velocity in streams follows patterns for naturally occurring allochthonous particles

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40126-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF CAREER award [1552825]
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [FP-91781601-0]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [1552825] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accumulation of plastic litter is accelerating worldwide. Rivers are a source of microplastic (i.e., particles <5 mm) to oceans, but few measurements of microplastic retention in rivers exist. We adapted spiraling metrics used to measure particulate organic matter transport to quantify microplastic deposition using an outdoor experimental stream. We conducted replicated pulse releases of three common microplastics: polypropylene pellets, polystyrene fragments, and acrylic fibers, repeating measurements using particles with and without biofilms. Depositional velocity (v(dep); mm/s) patterns followed expectations based on density and biofilm 'stickiness', where v(dep) was highest for fragments, intermediate for fibers, and lowest for pellets, with biofilm colonization generally increasing v(dep). Comparing microplastic v(dep) to values for natural particles (e.g., fine and coarse particulate organic matter) showed that particle diameter was positively related to v(dep) and negatively related to the ratio of v(dep) to settling velocity (i.e., sinking rate in standing water). Thus, microplastic v(dep) in rivers can be quantified with the same methods and follows the same patterns as natural particles. These data are the first measurements of microplastic deposition in rivers, and directly inform models of microplastic transport at the landscape scale, making a key contribution to research on the global ecology of plastic waste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available