4.7 Article

Hints for a Turnover at the Snow Line in the Giant Planet Occurrence Rate

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 874, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0300

Keywords

methods: statistical; planetary systems; planets and satellites: formation; protoplanetary disks; surveys

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [BSSGI0_155816]
  2. NASA Science Mission directorate
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX15AD94G]
  4. NASAs Science Mission Directorate
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The orbital distribution of giant planets is crucial for understanding how terrestrial planets form and predicting yields of exoplanet surveys. Here, we derive giant planets occurrence rates as a function of orbital period by taking into account the detection efficiency of the Kepler and radial velocity (RV) surveys. The giant planet occurrence rates for Kepler and RV show the same rising trend with increasing distance from the star. We identify a break in the RV giant planet distribution between similar to 2 and 3 au-close to the location of the snow line in the solar systemafter which the occurrence rate decreases with distance from the star. Extrapolating a broken power-law distribution to larger semimajor axes, we find good agreement with the similar to 1% planet occurrence rates from direct imaging surveys. Assuming a symmetric power law, we also estimate that the occurrence of giant planets between 0.1 and 100 au is 26.6(-5.4)(+7.5)% for planets with masses 0.1-20 M-J and decreases to 6.2(-1.2)(+1.5)% for planets more massive than Jupiter. This implies that only a fraction of the structures detected in disks around young stars can be attributed to giant planets. Various planet population synthesis models show good agreement with the observed distribution, and we show how a quantitative comparison between model and data can be used to constrain planet formation and migration mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available