4.4 Article

Clinical and prognosis value of the CIMP status combined with MLH1 or p16INK4a methylation in colorectal cancer

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1007-1

Keywords

CpG island methylator phenotype; MLH1; p16(INK4a); Colorectal cancer; Prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aberrant DNA methylation of CpG islands occurred frequently in CRC and associated with transcriptional silencing of key genes. In this study, the CIMP combined with MLH1 or p16(INK4a) methylation status was determined in CRC patients and correlated with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival. Our data showed that CIMP? CRCs were identified in 32.9% of cases and that CACNAG1 is the most frequently methylated promoter. When we combined the CIMP with the MLH1 or the p16(INK4a) methylation status, we found that CIMP-/ MLH1-U (37.8%) and CIMP-/p16(INK4a) -U (35.4%) tumors were the most frequent among the four subtypes. Statistical analysis showed that tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, TNM stage, and MSI differed among the group of patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed differences in overall survival according to the CIMP combined with MLH1 or p16(INK4a) methylation status. In a multivariate analysis, CIMP/MLH1 and CIMP/p16(INK4a) methylation statuses were predictive of prognosis, and the OS was longer for patients with tumors CIMP-/MLH1-M, as well as CIMP-/p16(INK4a) -M. Furthermore, DNMT1 is significantly overexpressed in tumors than in normal tissues as well as in CIMP? than CIMP-tumors. Our results suggest that tumor classification based on the CIMP status combined with MLH1 or p16(INK4a) methylation is useful to predict prognosis in CRC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available