4.8 Article

The theory of technological parasitism for the measurement of the evolution of technology and technological forecasting

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 289-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.012

Keywords

Measurement of technology; Technometrics; Technological evolution; Technological change; Coevolution; Nature of technology; Host technology; Parasitic technology; Technological parasitism; Technological innovation; Technological forecasting; Technology assessment; Technological progress

Funding

  1. National Endowment for the Humanities (United States of America)
  2. National Research Council of Italy-Direzione Generale Relazioni Internazionali [0072373-2014, 0003005-2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How to measure the evolution of technology in order to predict innovations that grow rapidly? This study suggests a new perspective based on the theory of technological parasitism, which can measure and assess the dynamics of technological evolution for technological forecasting. In particular, the evolution of technology is modelled here in terms of interaction between a host technology (system) and a parasitic technology (subsystem). The coefficient of evolutionary growth of the model here indicates the evolution of parasitic technology in relation to host technology, suggesting the evolutionary pathway of overall system of technology over time (i.e., underdevelopment, growth and development). This approach is illustrated with realistic examples using empirical data of of product and process technologies: farm tractor, freight locomotive, electricity generation and smartphone technology. Overall, then, the proposed model, based on the theory of technological parasitism, can be useful for bringing a new perspective to explain and generalize properties of the evolution of technology and predict which innovations are likely to evolve rapidly in society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available