4.7 Article

PGC-1α overexpression partially rescues impaired oxidative and contractile pathophysiology following volumetric muscle loss injury

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40606-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alliance for Regenerative Rehabilitation Research & Training (AR3T) - Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health [P2CHD086843]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institutes of Health [P2CHD086843]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) of the National Institutes of Health [P2CHD086843]
  4. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs [W81XWH-18-1-0710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury is characterized by a non-recoverable loss of muscle fibers due to ablative surgery or severe orthopaedic trauma, that results in chronic functional impairments of the soft tissue. Currently, the effects of VML on the oxidative capacity and adaptability of the remaining injured muscle are unclear. A better understanding of this pathophysiology could significantly shape how VML-injured patients and clinicians approach regenerative medicine and rehabilitation following injury. Herein, the data indicated that VML-injured muscle has diminished mitochondrial content and function (i.e., oxidative capacity), loss of mitochondrial network organization, and attenuated oxidative adaptations to exercise. However, forced PGC-1 alpha over-expression rescued the deficits in oxidative capacity and muscle strength. This implicates physiological activation of PGC1-alpha as a limiting factor in VML-injured muscle's adaptive capacity to exercise and provides a mechanistic target for regenerative rehabilitation approaches to address the skeletal muscle dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available