4.6 Article

Highly efficient CO2 capture by mixed matrix membranes containing three-dimensional covalent organic framework fillers

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 4549-4560

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta10333j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore [CENGas R-261-508-001-646]
  2. Ministry of Education - Singapore [MOE AcRF Tier 1 R-279-000-472-112, R-279-000-540-114]
  3. Agency for Science, Technology and Research [PSF 1521200078, IRG A1783c0015, IAF-PP A1789a0024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) have long been considered as promising membrane types for industrial energy-intensive gas separation processes. Current MMMs are still facing grand challenges of poor filler dispersion and poor polymer-filler interfacial compatibility. The present study demonstrates that these challenges can be addressed by fabricating MMMs containing three-dimensional (3D) covalent organic framework (COF) fillers with ultrasmall size-selective pores. Two different polymer matrixes, including glassy 6FDA-DAM and rubbery Pebax, are explored to validate the effectiveness of 3D COF fillers in improving the membrane separation performance. The pure organic nature of COFs facilitates their high affinity with pure organic polymer matrixes, leading to good interfacial compatibility in the resultant MMMs. These porous COF-300 fillers can increase the membrane fractional free volume that enhances the membrane gas permeability. Besides, the ultrasmall pores of COF-300 fillers and the rigidified polymer chains at the filler surface can enhance the size discriminative processes, resulting in increased membrane gas pair selectivity. Moreover, the separation performance of COF-300 can be further improved by functionalizing it with polyethylenimine (PEI), enabling the design of advanced membranes suitable for industrial applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available