4.3 Article

Long-term control of Paget's disease of bone with low-dose, once-weekly, oral bisphosphonate preparations, in a real world setting

Journal

ENDOCRINE
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 651-656

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-018-1806-y

Keywords

Paget's disease of bone; Bisphosphonates; Alendronate; Risedronate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeBisphosphonates are the mainstay of the treatment of Paget's disease of bone (PDB). Clinical practice guidelines recommend treatment with intravenous zoledronic acid or high-dose oral nitrogen bisphosphonates (N-BPs). We present our long-term experience treating PDB patients with lower than recommended oral doses of N-BPs, equivalent to once-weekly doses used for treating osteoporosis.MethodsPDB patients were seen, between 1990 and 2015 at the endocrine clinic of an academic medical center. Diagnosis was established according to accepted criteria. Patients were initially treated with alendronate 70mg/week or risedronate 35mg/week. Whenever the initial dose failed to produce remission, the dosage was increased to twice a week the respective dose.ResultsPatients were followed for a mean of 11.9 years (range: 1.7-24.8). Out of 96 treatment courses with N-BPs, 89% were with alendronate and 11% with risedronate. Remission was achieved in 84% of the courses with alendronate 70mg/week. 90% of those who did not achieve remission subsequently responded to 140mg/week. Out of the 8 treatment courses with risedronate 35mg/week, 87% achieved remission, and the 2 patients who did not achieve remission subsequently responded to 70mg/week. The median duration of remissions following 3-4 months courses of alendronate 70mg/week or risedronate 35mg/week was 8.8 months (IQR: 5.5, 14.8).ConclusionIn a large proportion of real world PDB patients, remission can be achieved with once-weekly, osteoporosis doses of alendronate or risedronate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available