4.7 Article

A geometric algebra approach to determine motion/constraint, mobility and singularity of parallel mechanism

Journal

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 273-293

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.06.005

Keywords

Parallel mechanism; Kinematics; Geometric algebra; Constraint; Mobility; Singularity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51675366, 51475321]
  2. Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology [15JCZDJC38900, 16JCYBJC19300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crucial procedure of mobility and singularity identification of parallel mechanisms is widely recognized as how to determine their motions (constraints) concisely and visually. In this paper, we propose a geometric algebra (GA) based approach to determine the motions/constraints, mobility and singularity of parallel mechanisms mainly utilizing the geometric and algebraic relations. Firstly, the motions, constraints and their relations are represented by conformal geometric algebra (CGA) formulas in a concise form by employing the characterized geometric elements with G(4,1). Secondly, the mobility of parallel mechanism, including its number and property and the axes of motions, not only at origin configuration but also in the prescribed workspace, is obtained by the procedure proposed in this paper. Thirdly, the singularity of parallel mechanism is identified by the two indices proposed in this paper with shuffle and outer products. Finally, a typical example is given to illustrate the motions/constraints, mobility and singularity analysis. This approach is beneficial to kinematic analysis and optimal design of parallel mechanisms, especially for which would be carried out in automatic and visual manner using computer programming languages. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available