4.7 Article

Computational prediction and experimental validation of revolute joint clearance wear in the low-velocity planar mechanism

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 963-976

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.09.027

Keywords

Revolute joint; Wear; Clearance contact; Multibody dynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51305143, 51675190, 51305142, 51405168]
  2. Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University [Kfkt2015-11]
  3. Regional development project of Fujian Province [2016H4010]
  4. Start-up Foundation of High-talent Research Project from Huaqiao University [12BS204]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2014J01191, 2014J01189]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M552429]
  7. Project of Xiamen Science and Technology Plan [3502Z20143041]
  8. Introduction of talents Huaqiao University Scientific Research Projects [12BS217]
  9. Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Science and Technology Research at Huaqiao University [ZQN-PY212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within the multibody dynamics framework, the paper proposed an efficient procedure to calculate revolute joint wear of planar mechanism with low velocity. Firstly, based on the wear test data, a method to calculate the wear coefficient that corresponds to the actual working condition of the mechanism is proposed. Then, an efficient iterative prediction method for joint clearance wear evolving in the multibody dynamic system in is proposed based on the Archard's wear model. Meanwhile, the wear tests of the typical mechanism have verified the method proposed in this paper. The research shows that when the increments of the wear depth of revolute joints are not big, the method can provide high prediction accuracy; however, as the predicted wear depth increases, the prediction error increases as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available