4.7 Article

Experimental structural damage localization in beam structure using spatial continuous wavelet transform and mode shape curvature methods

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 253-270

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.02.005

Keywords

Wavelet; Deflection shape; Damage; Beam; Scale; Reliability

Funding

  1. Latvia State Research Programme under grant agreement Innovative Materials and Smart Technologies for Environmental Safety, IMATEH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental dynamic vibration test using, a non-contact scanning laser vibrometer is performed in order to extract the deflection shapes of two aluminium beams containing a notch cut out with a mill and two carbon/epoxy composite beams containing an impact damage of different severities. All of the beams are subjected to the clamped-clamped boundary conditions. These shapes are used as an input in a continuous wavelet transform technique for damage detection. In total, 78 wavelet functions with scale factors from 1 till 128 are used for the aluminium beams, whereas deflection shapes for composite beams are obtained in two dimensions, thus a two-dimensional wavelet transform is employed using 16 wavelet functions, all at scales fromi till 16. The scale, which is most suitable for damage identification, is found by calculating Standardized damage index and the parameter called damage estimate reliability for the scales under investigation. Another method, based on mode shape curvature squares, is also applied to identify the damage. A baseline data of deflection shapes at a healthy state is not required for both methods to work. Damage identification results are compared for both methods. To assess the robustness of an algorithm involving both methods, different sensor densities are simulated by reducing the input deflection shapes by integer factors. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available