4.5 Article

Experimental Warming Alters Productivity and Isotopic Signatures of Tundra Mosses

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 1070-1082

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-015-9884-7

Keywords

global change; permafrost; bryophytes; Sphagnum; Pleurozium; Dicranum; NPP; delta C-13; delta N-15

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the tundra, mosses play an important functional role regulating belowground and ecosystem processes, but there is still considerable uncertainty about how tundra moss communities will respond to climate change. We examined the effects of 5 years of in situ air and soil warming on net primary productivity (NPP), carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) isotope signatures (delta C-13 and delta N-15), and C:N in dominant Alaskan tundra mosses. Air warming increased mean air temperatures by up to 0.5A degrees C and resulted in an 80-90% reduction in NPP in the feather moss Pleurozium and the peat moss Sphagnum. Soil warming increased permafrost thaw depth by 12-18%, upper soil water content by 23-27%, and resulted in a threefold increase in Sphagnum NPP. delta C-13 was positively correlated with moss NPP, and increased by 0.5-1aEuro degrees in all mosses under soil warming. C:N was reduced in Sphagnum and Pleurozium, due to increases in tissue %N in the soil warming treatment, suggesting that moss N availability could increase as temperatures increases. Higher N availability in warmer conditions, however, may be offset by unfavorable moisture conditions for moss growth. Similar to responses in tundra vascular plant communities, our results forecast interspecific differences in productivity among tundra mosses. Specifically, air warming may reduce productivity in Sphagnum and Pleurozium, but soil warming could offset this response in Sphagnum. Such responses may lead to changes in tundra moss community structure and function as temperatures increase that have the potential to alter tundra C and N cycling in a future climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available