4.5 Review

I don't get no respect: the role of chloride in acute kidney injury

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 316, Issue 3, Pages F587-F605

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00130.2018

Keywords

acute kidney injury; chloride; hyperchloremia; intravenous fluids; tubuloglomerular feedback

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01DK096549, R01HL085757, U01DK082185, U01DK106962, T32DK007757]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major public health problem that complicates 10-40% of hospital admissions. Importantly, AKI is independently associated with increased risk of progression to chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular events, and increased risk of in-hospital and long-term mortality. The chloride content of intravenous fluid has garnered much attention over the last decade, as well as its association with excess use and adverse outcomes, including AKI. Numerous studies show that changes in serum chloride concentration, independent of serum sodium and bicarbonate, are associated with increased risk of AKI, morbidity, and mortality. This comprehensive review details the complex renal physiology regarding the role of chloride in regulating renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, tubuloglomerular feedback, and tubular injury, as well as the findings of clinical research related to the chloride content of intravenous fluids, changes in serum chloride concentration, and AKI. Chloride is underappreciated in both physiology and pathophysiology. Although the exact mechanism is debated, avoidance of excessive chloride administration is a reasonable treatment option for all patients and especially in those at risk for AKI. Therefore, high-risk patients and those with incipient AKI should receive balanced solutions rather than normal saline to minimize the risk of AKI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available