4.4 Article

Maternal dietary intake during pregnancy and its association to birth size in rural Malawi: A cross-sectional study

Journal

MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12433

Keywords

food group intake; Malawi; milk intake; neonatal anthropometry; nutrient intake; pregnancy

Funding

  1. Global Health and Vaccination Program (GLOBVAC)
  2. Throne Holst Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In low-resource settings, such as rural Malawi, pregnant women are prone to energy and micronutrient deficiencies with the consequence of delivering low-birth weight infants with higher risks of morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to examine the association between maternal dietary intakes during pregnancy and infant birth size. Dietary intakes of 203 pregnant women were assessed between 28 and 35weeks of gestation and their infants' (n=132) birth size measured. Intakes of energy, macronutrients, and 11 micronutrients were estimated using a 3-day interactive 24-hr diet recall. Semiquantitative data on food intakes for four additional days were also collected to assess food patterns. Using multilevel linear regression modeling, maternal intakes of carbohydrate were negatively associated with neonate length (: -0.1; 95% CI: -0.2, 0.0cm/E%) and abdominal circumference (: -0.1, 95% CI: -0.2, 0.0cm/E%), whereas intakes of fat were positively associated with neonate length (: 0.1; 95% CI: 0.0, 0.2cm/E%) and abdominal circumference (: 0.1; 95% CI: 0.0, 0.2cm/E%). Vitamin C intakes were positively associated with birth weight (: 1.4; 95% CI: 0.5, 2.3g/mg). The frequency of milk intake was positively associated with birth weight (: 75.3; 95% CI: 13.6, 137.0g/day). These findings offer practical suggestions for food-based interventions in the study area to promote inclusion of fat, vitamin C-rich foods, and milk in pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available