4.4 Article

Longer duration of smoking abstinence is associated with waning cessation fatigue

Journal

BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 12-18

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.011

Keywords

Quitting; Cessation; Nicotine dependence; Cessation fatigue

Funding

  1. US National Cancer Institute [P01 CA200512]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN-148477]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1106451]
  4. US National Institute on Drug Abuse [K23 DA041616, K23 DA045766, R25 DA020537]
  5. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cessation fatigue, a construct theorized to reflect exhaustion of coping resources due to quitting smoking, has been found to predict relapse. This study examines the association between cessation fatigue and duration of abstinence among 1397 adult former smokers who participated in the 2016 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Smoking and Vaping Wave 1 Survey (4CV). We hypothesized lower levels of cessation fatigue will be correlated with longer duration of abstinence. Method: Data for this cross-sectional study were collected in a web-based survey which recruited national samples from Australia, Canada, England, and United States. Former smokers were abstinent up to five years. Results: Lower cessation fatigue was associated with longer duration of smoking abstinence. Cessation fatigue was highest in former smokers that had been quit for up to six months, with lower cessation fatigue found in those quit for at least seven months and another drop-off in fatigue observed for those quit for at least two years. Conclusions: Cessation fatigue is highest soon after quitting smoking but declines over time for those who remain abstinent. Understanding the mechanisms by which cessation fatigue is related to abstinence could potentially offer insights into ways to help individuals sustain quitting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available