4.6 Article

Modulation of TAP-dependent antigen compartmentalization during human monocyte-to-DC differentiation

Journal

BLOOD ADVANCES
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 839-850

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018027268

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation DFG [SFB854, SFB807, EXC 115, EXC 2155]
  2. Hannover Biomedical Research School
  3. Cusanuswerk and Stiftung Dey
  4. Center for Infection Biology
  5. Helmholtz Virtual Institute [VH-VI-424]
  6. European Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dendritic cells (DCs) take up antigen in the periphery, migrate to secondary lymphoid organs, and present processed antigen fragments to adaptive immune cells and thus prime antigen-specific immunity. During local inflammation, recirculating monocytes are recruited from blood to the inflamed tissue, where they differentiate to macrophages and DCs. In this study, we found that monocytes showed high transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP)-dependent peptide compartmentalization and that after antigen pulsing, they were not able to efficiently stimulate antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Nevertheless, upon in vitro differentiation to monocyte-derived DCs, TAP-dependent peptide compartmentalization as well as surface major histocompatibility complex I turnover decreased and the cells efficiently restimulated T lymphocytes. Although TAP-dependent peptide compartmentalization decreased during DC differentiation, TAP expression levels increased. Furthermore, TAP relocated from early endosomes in monocytes to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and lysosomal compartments in DCs. Collectively, these data are compatible with the model that during monocyte-to-DC differentiation, the subcellular relocation of TAP and the regulation of its activity assure spatiotemporal separation of local antigen uptake and processing by monocytes and efficient T-lymphocyte stimulation by DCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available