4.8 Article

Topological effects of network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 687-695

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12447

Keywords

Cooperation; network dynamics; social network; spotted hyena

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  4. NSF [EF-0832858, DBI-1300426, IOS-1121474, DEB-1353110]
  5. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  6. NIH [R01GM105042]
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1121474, 1353110] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1300426] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social structure influences ecological processes such as dispersal and invasion, and affects survival and reproductive success. Recent studies have used static snapshots of social networks, thus neglecting their temporal dynamics, and focused primarily on a limited number of variables that might be affecting social structure. Here, instead we modelled effects of multiple predictors of social network dynamics in the spotted hyena, using observational data collected during 20years of continuous field research in Kenya. We tested the hypothesis that the current state of the social network affects its long-term dynamics. We employed stochastic agent-based models that allowed us to estimate the contribution of multiple factors to network changes. After controlling for environmental and individual effects, we found that network density and individual centrality affected network dynamics, but that social bond transitivity consistently had the strongest effects. Our results emphasise the significance of structural properties of networks in shaping social dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available