4.8 Article

Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 761-771

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12453

Keywords

Crop rotation; microbial community; soil carbon; soil nitrogen; soil organic matter

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Processes Program [2009-65107-05961]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-FCO2-07ER64494]
  3. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-ACO5-76RL01830]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program [DEB 1027253]
  5. W. K. Kellogg Biological Station
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1027253] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodiversity loss, an important consequence of agricultural intensification, can lead to reductions in agroecosystem functions and services. Increasing crop diversity through rotation may alleviate these negative consequences by restoring positive aboveground-belowground interactions. Positive impacts of aboveground biodiversity on belowground communities and processes have primarily been observed in natural systems. Here, we test for the effects of increased diversity in an agroecosystem, where plant diversity is increased over time through crop rotation. As crop diversity increased from one to five species, distinct soil microbial communities were related to increases in soil aggregation, organic carbon, total nitrogen, microbial activity and decreases in the carbon-to-nitrogen acquiring enzyme activity ratio. This study indicates positive biodiversity-function relationships in agroecosystems, driven by interactions between rotational and microbial diversity. By increasing the quantity, quality and chemical diversity of residues, high diversity rotations can sustain soil biological communities, with positive effects on soil organic matter and soil fertility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available