3.8 Article

Stigma against tuberculosis may hinder non-household contact investigation: a qualitative study in Thailand

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 15-23

Publisher

INT UNION AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS LUNG DISEASE (I U A T L D)
DOI: 10.5588/pha.18.0055

Keywords

TB; contact investigation; stigma; qualitative research; non-household

Funding

  1. Thailand Health System Research Institute (HSRI
  2. Nonthaburi, Thailand) [HSRI60-033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Setting: A northern province in Thailand. Objectives: To explore experiences and perspectives on tuberculosis (TB) contact investigations in non-household contacts. Design: Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with eight groups: three groups of former TB patients (teachers, students and hospital staff) and five groups of representatives from congregate settings such as schools and workplaces. Data were analysed using the modified grounded theory. Result: Annual health check-ups at the workplace contributed to the early detection of active TB in teachers. Former TB patients were highly exposed to non-household contacts, but contact investigations were limited to household contacts only. Barriers and facilitators for non-household contact investigations are associated with five factors, including information, awareness and knowledge about TB; stigma; empathy; health system response and informing non-household contacts about TB exposure. Stigma may be the main barrier to investigations among non-household contacts because TB patients tend to withhold information about their diagnosis from colleagues. Lack of knowledge and misperceptions regarding TB transmission contributed to stigma. Empathy with other people encouraged TB patients to inform non-household contacts. Conclusion: Non-household contact investigations are not performed despite the risk of TB transmission. To promote contact investigations in congregate settings, interventions to overcome TB stigma and improve public knowledge about TB transmission are required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available