4.8 Review

Toward practical solar hydrogen production - an artificial photosynthetic leaf-to-farm challenge

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 1908-1971

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00699g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Climate Change Response project [2015M1A2A2074663, NRF-2017M1A2A2087630]
  2. Korea Center for Artificial Photosynthesis (KCAP) [2009-0093880]
  3. MOTIE of the Republic of Korea [10050509]
  4. 2018 Research Fund [1.180006.01]
  5. [NRF-2015R1A2A1A10054346]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solar water splitting is a promising approach to transform sunlight into renewable, sustainable and green hydrogen energy. There are three representative ways of transforming solar radiation into molecular hydrogen, which are the photocatalytic (PC), photoelectrochemical (PEC), and photovoltaic-electrolysis (PV-EC) routes. Having the future perspective of green hydrogen economy in mind, this review article discusses devices and systems for solar-to-hydrogen production including comparison of the above solar water splitting systems. The focus is placed on a critical assessment of the key components needed to scale up PEC water splitting systems such as materials efficiency, cost, elemental abundancy, stability, fuel separation, device operability, cell architecture, and techno-economic aspects of the systems. The review follows a stepwise approach and provides (i) a summary of the basic principles and photocatalytic materials employed for PEC water splitting, (ii) an extensive discussion of technologies, procedures, and system designs, and (iii) an introduction to international demonstration projects, and the development of benchmarked devices and large-scale prototype systems. The task of scaling up of laboratory overall water splitting devices to practical systems may be called an artificial photosynthetic leaf-to-farm challenge''.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available