4.7 Article

Ratcheting strain and its effect on low cycle fatigue behavior of Al 7075-T6 alloy

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.048

Keywords

Aluminum 7075-T6 alloy; Ratcheting strain; Low cycle fatigue; Mean stress; Stress amplitude

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India under the Fast Track Young Scientist- Engineering Science Scheme [SR/F/1499/2014-15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this investigation was to examine the role of accumulation of ratcheting strain on low cycle fatigue behavior of aluminum 7075-T6 alloy. For this purpose, first ratcheting behavior of the alloy was studied using asymmetric stress-controlled low cycle fatigue tests up to 2000 cycles. Post-ratcheting stain-controlled low cycle fatigue tests were done on ratcheted specimens up to failure. Further, stain-controlled low cycle fatigue tests without any previous ratcheting were also conducted up to failure in order to compare the behavior with and without previous ratcheting. A few ratcheted specimens were studied using transmission electron microscope to assess the dislocation features generated due to ratcheting. The results indicated that increase of either stress amplitude or mean stress increased the ratcheting strain accumulated in the material. Ladder-like dislocation structure prevailed in the specimens deformed at lower stress levels while dislocation tangles were predominantly present in specimens deformed at higher stresses. Analysis of post-ratcheting low cycle fatigue behavior showed that fatigue life of the alloy decreased with the increase of previously imposed ratcheting strain. Comparison of low cycle fatigue behavior of the investigated alloy with and without ratcheting indicated that ratcheting strain was detrimental to fatigue life of aluminum 7075-T6 alloy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available